_2010 was called the “year of disaster” but 2011 far outshone that year in terms of destruction. Why? Are disasters increasing?
By Susan Seymour Hedke, Author & Astrologer 12/13/2011 www.galactic-centre-2012.com See Most of her articles on Scribd.com Reposted by Zach Royer 12/14/2011 On December 19th of each year the Sun passes along the ecliptic close to the position of the Galactic Center, which is between the sting of the Scorpio constellation and the arrow of Sagittarius. At the present time the Galactic Center is in the Sun sign of Sagittarius approaching its closest alignment with our Winter Solstice. The Sun crosses the Winter Solstice on the 21st – 22nd December of each year. The centre of the galactic axis or plane of the Milky Way has already passed the solstice most exactly in 1998. Yet in broad terms we can say that the Galactic Center end of the galactic axis is aligned with the winter solstice at this time in history, something that occurs only once in a Great Year cycle. In 2005, while drawing up the chart of the Indian Ocean Earthquake I made a discovery that connected this alignment or conjunction with disaster on Earth, for the Sun was close to the Winter Solstice and the Galactic Center while the nearly full Moon was opposite as the earthquake of 26 December 2004 occurred. I then went on to discover that similar alignments of the Sun and/ or Moon/ and or other heavenly bodies to the Galactic Center have been a repeated trigger for disasters of all kinds in the history of our planet. As the astrology involved is rather complicated, I have decided to give most evidence for this by simply listing some of the major disasters in our known or recent history and some of the most significant alignments related to their occurrence. Click read more to read the entire article.
0 Comments
Boron (B) (5) _ (REW) This is going to be an exciting new year for energy production on planet Earth! Two different revolutionary green energy solutions are about to take giant steps. With the Thrive documentary shedding some much needed light on the New Energy Movement and Andrea Rossi's ECAT now out of the proverbial bag, it seems the thought of New Energy Technologies reaching the public is no longer just some farfetched idea. After 60 years of dangerous nuclear power based on bomb technology, we may finally see nuclear energy that is clean, safe and cheap as dirt. If we could achieve 100% efficiency, E=MC² tells us that one ounce of matter could be converted to seventy million dollars worth of electricity! But today’s nuclear plants use only a fraction of a percent of the energy in the fuel. The rest remains as dangerous radioactive waste. The neutrons produced create dangerous waste and heat, which must then be converted to electricity. About 80% of the cost of existing nuclear plants is for the steam plant that converts about 1/3 of the heat to electricity and disposes of the other 2/3 as waste heat to a nearby body of water. Finally, several private companies have broken away from the military-industrial domination of government supported energy research to develop inherently-safe, nuclear reactions that produce electricity directly and produce no neutrons. Tri-Alpha raised $50 million from investors like Paul Allen and Goldman Sachs. They are currently in stealth mode, developing a device that will fire two balls of lightning (plasmoids) into each other to fuse Boron and hydrogen. Boron is cheap, safe and plentiful. If all of the world’s power was generated from boron, it would only use 10% of our current production. Boron fusion produces only safe, non-radioactive helium as a product. Boron is the chemical element with atomic number 5 and the chemical symbol B. Boron is a metalloid. Because boron is produced entirely by cosmic ray spallation and not by stellar nucleosynthesis, it is a low-abundance element in both the solar system and the Earth's crust. However, boron is concentrated on Earth by the water-solubility of its more common naturally occurring compounds, the borate minerals. These are mined industrially as evaporate ores, such as borax and kernite. The big problem with Boron is that it requires a temperature of about a billion degrees to fuse. Most fusion research has tried to use hydrogen isotopes that fuse at a much cooler 100 million degrees. Though a billion degrees sounds like an impossible goal, there are natural processes that routinely achieve high temperatures for nanoseconds in tiny micron-sized areas. A very simple device called a dense plasma focus (DPF) can launch a ball of electrical plasma which then shrinks to an infinitesimal point. As the ball shrinks, its energy becomes concentrated in a smaller and smaller volume making the temperature rise incredibly. Power density increases of ten thousand trillion are possible.
Consumers are dying today in part because they continue to eat dead foods that are killed in the microwave. They take a perfectly healthy piece of raw food, loaded with vitamins and natural medicines, then nuke it in the microwave and destroy most of its nutrition. Humans are the only animals on the planet who destroy the nutritional value of their food before eating it. All other animals consume food in its natural, unprocessed state, but humans actually go out of their way to render food nutritionally worthless before eating it. No wonder humans are the least healthy mammals on the planet.
In Russia, microwave ovens were banned in 1976 because of their negative health consequences as many studies were conducted on their use. The ban was lifted after Perestroika in the early 90’s. Numerous documents can be found online relating to this subject. The invention of the microwave and its mass adoption by the population coincides with the onset of obesity in developed nations around the world. Not only did the microwave make it convenient to eat more obesity-promoting foods, it also destroyed much of the nutritional content of those foods, leaving consumers in an ongoing state of malnourished overfeeding. In other words, people eat too many calories but not enough real nutrition. The result is, of course, what we see today: Epidemic rates of diabetes, cancer, heart disease, depression, kidney failure, liver disorders and much more. These diseases are all caused by a combination of malnutrition and exposure to toxic chemicals (plus other factors such as emotional trauma, lack of exercise, etc.). Microwaves make malnutrition virtually automatic, and being exposed to toxic chemicals is easy to accomplish by simply eating processed foods (which are universally manufactured with the addition of toxic chemicals that act as preservatives, colorings, flavor enhancers and so on). This July saw the last mission of the space shuttle, and marked an end to the first era of space exploration. But what's next? NASA has no replacement for the shuttle and will have to rely on Russia and the European Space Agency to bring crews and supplies to the International Space Station. The U.S. has lost its leadership in space exploration. Or has it? For over 70 years, our military has been working on top secret projects in the field of electrogravitics, In the mid-1920s, an American scientist, Townsend Brown, discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled, and if he charged a metallic disc to a high voltage it had a tendency to move toward its positive pole, now known as the Biefield-Brown effect. Around 1953, Brown conducted a demonstration for the military where he flew a pair of 3-foot-diameter discs, energized with 150,000 volts and tethered to a 50-foot pole, and attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The U.S. military soon had major contractors, which included Lockheed, Convair, Sperry Rand, General Electric, and many others, working on electrogravitics. In 1968, Northrop conducted wind tunnel tests where they charged the leading wing with a high voltage, with the idea that this would soften the sonic boom of an aircraft. This technology was applied by Northrop in the B-2 “Spirit” stealth bomber, which uses electrogravitic propulsion once airborne, by positively charging the leading wing and negatively charging its exhaust. (NPR) The early Earth had two moons instead of just one — our familiar moon, as well as a smaller companion moon that also rose and set in the sky for tens of millions of years. That's according to a new theory that says this smaller moon eventually went careening into our moon and is still there, in the form of mountains on its far side. (Image: An artist's illustration shows a collision between the moon and a companion moon. Scientists say the collision could be responsible for the moon's asymmetric shape) Scientists have long puzzled over those mountains, and the fact that the two sides of our moon are very different. The near side has flat lowlands, while the far side is high and mountainous. Erik Asphaug, professor of Earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz, says he was at a talk about this asymmetry when he got an idea. "I thought, 'Well, you know, what about just something colliding with the moon, in such a manner that it didn't form a crater, but it just made a big splat?'" he recalls. Researchers believe that our moon was created when a giant object the size of Mars hit the early Earth, sending out a disc of debris orbiting our planet. That debris coalesced to form the moon, says Asphaug, but companion moons could have formed at the same time. He and a colleague, Martin Jutzi, did computer simulations to see what might happen if a small companion moon did a slow-motion collision with our moon. |
News Watch
Mind-opening news articles, editorials, videos & apparel that inspire our readers and help liberate them from the status quo. Stay informed.
Write For UsSpace WatchTop NewsNews Watch Categories
All
|
|
HAVE A TIP OR STORY TO TELL? JOIN TODAY & SHARE YOUR STORY!
If you have a breaking news tip or idea, please email: [email protected] Apparently Apparel® is a registered trade name and part of the ZOAT International® brands network. © 2007-2023. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. All art & news content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. ApparentlyApparel.com is not responsible for content written by contributing artists, authors or news feeds. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. ApparentlyApparel.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material.
|
|